The participants for this year’s Santa Fe Review have been listed on their site, along with sample photos from their body of work and links to their websites. I’ve looked through a number of the images and have to say that I think there are a lot of lackluster bodies of work in this session. I can’t say if this is something unique to just this year’s entrants or if this was also true of the past because I didn’t see all the previous entrants’ bodies of work. A lot of the work doesn’t seem to merit review on its saliency and a lot of it is just plain horrible. I don’t say that lightly. A lot of the work is recycled and for the 1,000th time; empty freeways, come on.
A lot of the work, as with much of photography these days, seems very overproduced. I think the Santa Fe Review should eschew this kind of work and I thought that they did, but apparently not. Every time I see very produced work, I can’t help but think of the intro Jello Biafra says for Nazi Punks Fuck Off; “This is fuck off overproduced by Martin Hannett take 4!”
I’m a lo-fi kind of guy. I’m just not interested in seeing commercial treatments of fine art by big time commercial cats. The music analogy is very relevant to me. ELO, The Eagles, REO Speedwagon, Peter Frampton, Doobie Brothers grate on my last nerve. If there is content there, why try to glitter it up and if there isn’t any content, overproduction doesn’t overcome its absence. Its true for music and it is certainly true for photography.